Foil Design Comparer

Pick a preset foil and stab, compare setups, or just experiment with design parameters.

Front:
Stab:

The scores come from simple lifting-line and section formulas, not from a tank test. Treat them as a way to feel the trade-offs, not as a prediction of what a real wing will do.

Axis name their wings by span in millimetres rather than area. The Fireball areas up to 1070 are Axis's own numbers; the larger Fireballs and every other Axis family are worked back from the aspect ratio each range runs, so treat them as close rather than exact.

In the Armstrong list, only area and span come from Armstrong's published figures. Everything else, including thickness, camber and sweep, is my estimate of what each family is doing, so the scores show the family's character rather than a measurement of the real wing.

Sweep is modelled on the actual swept-wing relations rather than a single made-up exponent: the flow component crossing the leading edge falls off as the cosine of the sweep angle, and that is what the section feels for lift purposes, so thickness and camber effectively shrink by that cosine while the physical section stays fat. The benefit against drag rise and cavitation is real but milder \u2014 based on measured swept-hydrofoil data (Hefazi & Besnard), it fades only about a quarter as fast as the pure cosine would suggest. Sweep also makes lift itself fall very slightly, matching the classical result that a swept wing lifts a bit less than an unswept one at the same angle.